The title of this piece refers to a colourful expression we used growing up in Oxford; so common was it that I thought everyone in the country used it. Apparently they didn’t or don’t. I still do though and so does everyone I know in Oxford. It is used to describe someone’s swift and vigorous reaction to something said to them in the moment – i.e. the person going about their business, is interrupted by something they perceive as abusive or unjust, then stops what they are doing to confront the assailant/s. Get it? Right…
In the last Howlin’ I wrote a little on David Icke’s travails with travel to Oz on a yak tour.
On the face of it the best one could say about the government of that sun-burned land is that they, failing to check the facts, got burned themselves by intentionally deceptive misrepresentation by sorts with ulterior agendas and orders. What the idiotic speech-writers and purveyors of Dark causes don’t seem to get is that claims of Icke’s anti-semitism are fast becoming one of the best of cures for somnambulism. Those who can understand what words are saying only have to read David’s books to wake up to who is telling the truth here – and who benefits from skewing his messages.
Here are the source paragraphs these malign scoundrels twist to go by, and use to lean on others to stay away from Icke’s books and talks. They are from David Icke’s book, The Truth Will Set You Free:
P. 130 I strongly believe that a small Jewish clique which has contempt for the mass of Jewish people worked with non-Jews to create the First World War, the Russian Revolution, and the Second World War. This Jewish/non-Jewish Elite used the First World War to secure the Balfour Declaration and the principle of the Jewish State of Israel (for which, given the genetic history of most Jewish people, there is absolutely no justification on historical grounds or any other). They then dominated the Versailles Peace Conference and created the circumstances which made the Second World War inevitable. They financed Hitler to power in 1933 and made the funds available for his rearmament.
P. 135 How is it right that while this fierce suppression goes on, free copies of the Spielberg film, Schindler’s List, are given to schools to indoctrinate children with the unchallenged version of events. And why do we, who say we oppose tyranny and demand freedom of speech, allow people to go to prison and be vilified, and magazines to be closed down on the spot, for suggesting another version of history.
Digital source: HPANWO Voice comment by Anonymous
What I didn’t know when I wrote the piece about it was that he had been interviewed on Australia’s Channel 10. Actually it was less an interview and more an ambush but the four ill-prepared and witless clowns in the studio were thoroughly routed by one man who stood fully in that place of power that is reserved for truth. They served the usual yes or no questions at David which he batted away without breaking sweat. There are no one-word answers for questions like, ‘Do you believe that 6 to 12 millions Jews were killed by the Nazis and the Germans in World War 2?’ or ‘Do you believe in shape-shifting reptiles who control the world blah blah’? For a start the term, ‘believe’ has big problems. If one is determinedly working towards finding truth, as David Icke clearly is, then belief cannot come into the equation. Lots of exhaustive research, often in the inaccessible places, has to be done and other people’s careful studies examined and collated. There is absolutely no substitute for personal experience but matching first hand testimony from many sources that/who do not, or cannot know each other comes close, and that is the material David Icke reports on and brings together to construct many of his proposals. How could he possibly give a one word answer to questions on anything he himself was not personally involved in? Nobody knows how many people died and suffered at the hands of tyrants during WWII let alone in the Nazi concentration camps. If he’d said ‘no’, the imbeciles would have screamed ‘holocaust denial’ when what he was really saying was that he didn’t know, so couldn’t believe, that many people died by those hands and under the said circumstances. If he’d said yes then he would have been bearing false witness, lying to himself. Admirably he didn’t take the bait, but then he’s swatted more flies, each of them having more brain cells and less ambition than this sorry bunch over his long career.
He got off his bike alright but instead of giving them a good hiding himself he let them smack themselves in their conceited clueless faces.
One of them (yellow dress) did say she, “would get the book today and have a crack at it“. Would have been a good idea to have done that before making an arse of herself, perhaps there wasn’t time, but then there seems to have been enough for her to make her mind up before launching her spittled rants.
Here’s David Icke’s interview on Channel 10:
I do have to say ‘Well done’ to Channel 10 for actually keeping this exposure of their crappy programme and pathetically biased presenters for all to see. Maybe there’s some hope yet…or will they take it down?
If you want to read lots of the public’s view of the show then you can read the comments here:
25th February 2019
The day Australian freedom died
Ask yourself this simple question. It needs just a yay or nay, with no middle ground. Do you believe in freedom of speech? No shades of grey. You either believe in it. Or you don’t. No picking and choosing about who gets to employ it, and who doesn’t. One in, all in. Unless you’re in China of course, or Russia.
And, so it would seem, Australia.